UK & World

Assisted suicide is not just a matter of autonomy

On Friday, the assisted suicide bill comes in front of the House of Lords for a second reading. It seeks to abolish the long-standing crime of suicide aid in certain medical and personal situations confirmed by the High Court through the Family Department, with the patient’s request for this and the agreement of the two doctors. .. This is a crucial and profound step for any legislature to decide. It deserves rigorous consideration.

The well-meaning and well-meaning approaches of those involved in supporting assisted suicide are not definitive in such a process. The dangers of such new legislation are several and very serious. The bill supports an invincible minority against the majority of vulnerable people.

At the heart of the bill is the clear and definitive decision of the suffering person to assist assisted suicide. However, it is not just a matter of autonomy, as many messages have been sent to parliamentarians, emphasizing the family’s role in the decision not to pursue assisted suicide, especially despite the suffering of all involved.

Can you medically conclude that the main requirements of the bill for terminal illness with a reasonable prognosis within 6 months are met because the weight of the study and various conditions can be reliably met?

How will the provision of treatment, care and understanding affect existing palliative care units that are already assisted suicide? Some foreign jurisdictions have already introduced requirements to promote assisted suicide in such units for financial reasons. How do the two doctors investigate and eliminate family coercion and excessive pressure, as the bill requires? Will they investigate their relatives and their respective views on assisted suicide?

The final decision by a family judge is clearly not a simple rubber stamp practice.

In the 2014 Supreme Court ruling on Nicklinson, Sir Wilson, a lifelong expert in family law, wants to deal specifically with assisted suicide and investigate before the judge decides whether to agree. We have presented more than 18 possible potential factors. He explained the “clever nature” of such research.

And what about monitoring medical responsibility to provide assisted suicide? The bill will introduce a system of codes of conduct for assisted suicide procedures. They will probably come from the government after consultation with the medical college. The code is then sent to Congress for review through the statutory document route rather than legislation. Therefore, they could not be amended, but as of the last bill of 2014, the government stated that this issue of suicide aid was due to Congress, not government policy. How effectively does Congressional voice sound in this scenario?

The bill would enact that the deadly drug would be given by the attending physician or another doctor or nurse approved by him. What if I have a conscientious objection to military service that is said to be protected by the bill? Can they refuse or are they obliged to refer to other staff who do it? Is the doctor Hippocratic’s pledge not to intentionally harm the patient now dismantled? Are there doctors who do not provide assisted suicide and doctors who apply the same oath but make a significant difference?

And finally, what about our healthcare system? The bill seems to apply to both private health and public health. So did the public ward support assisted suicide units? Will private medical companies set up death clinics like Dignitas? And the bill applies only to England and Wales. Assisted suicide is not a law in Scotland and Northern Ireland. Will this lead to a cross-border search within the coalition for assisted suicide?

This is the third such type of bill that will come before the Lord recently in 2005, 2014, and now in 2021. Previous attempts were unsuccessful, and the bill was unsuccessful. Not surprisingly, individual autonomy has some community-based restrictions, especially when it comes to living or dying.

As Sir Samphon specifically stated in Nicklinson’s ruling, the serious issue remains “the magnitude of the risk to the vulnerable who are ready to accept in this area to promote invincible suicide.” ..

Assisted suicide is not just a matter of autonomy

Source link Assisted suicide is not just a matter of autonomy

Related Articles

Back to top button