England’s ash alarm bell rings after struggling without Jack Ruetsch against New Zealand

It’s fair to say British The ashes blueprint needs to be tweaked to the evidence for the first two days of this second and last test. new Zealand..

After struggling over 76.3 on the field, Joe Root’s team found themselves in an enviable position when tourists reached just 74 runs behind England’s first inning 303 with seven wickets. I did.

New Zealand is a great team, of course, but six changes for next week’s World Test Championship final with India as captain Kane Williamson and wicket-keeper batter BJ Watling go missing due to injury. Was added.

They were there for a take at Edgbaston, but England wasn’t good enough so far and couldn’t post a total of significant first innings exacerbated by an unbalanced selection of attacks.

The sight of Route throwing a part-time spin 26 over into New Zealand’s innings was probably a sign that Jack Ruetsch should have been chosen for the match. That feeling was heightened when Dan Lawrence, who bowled 18 balls in test cricket before Friday, was thrown to death to see what his more part-time offspin could offer. ..

Lawrence, who had previously reached a test best score of 81, made a breakthrough with at least the last ball of the day to help England bring the total of his first innings to over 300. The first test wicket.

Given that England will take the second new ball at the beginning of the third day, it may be useful.

Still, the point remains. Why didn’t they choose the frontline spinner of this match in reach instead of relying on part-timers? In Sri Lanka and India, where Reach robbed 28 wickets on 31.14, it’s not without a good winter.

Indeed, New Zealand’s Ajazz Patel won 34-2 in England’s innings. If I have the opportunity to bowl again in Birmingham, I think he has the power to add to that.

As always this year, the answer to why Reach was overlooked is in this winter’s Ash series. Not only did this Edgbaston pitch not seem to be very useful for spinners, England decided to try Australia’s plans. This includes two high speed bowlers (here Ollystone and Markwood) and two controls. ‘Bowler-Stuart Broad and James Anderson-Runrate for this match can be dried and pressured.

Reach could have played a major role, as England doesn’t think spin will be an important factor in Australia and part-time bowling on the route can do the job as needed. It was overlooked in the match.

Worried about Route, his two best bowlers at the distance on the second day of the test were Broad and Anderson. Given the level of performance, both should have been rewarded with more wickets, but New Zealand was lucky enough to finish in a dominant position.

Coming to Australia, Anderson is 39 years old and Broad 35 years old. It goes without saying that I can’t work because my performance level hasn’t declined over the years.

But England had to see much more from both Stone and Wood, despite yet another unfortunately slow pitch mitigating factor. Both were below par, with Stone in particular allowing 58 runs from 15 wicketless overs.

Stone should have had Young’s scalp 7 days after the root provokes a slipped edge. But the fact that the New Zealanders continued to make 82 proved that England needed to be much more ruthless in the field to challenge Australia in the winter, no matter what the team’s composition.

follow us I play sports on Facebook More Cricket News, Interviews, Features

Cricket details

England’s ash alarm bell rings after struggling without Jack Ruetsch against New Zealand

Source link England’s ash alarm bell rings after struggling without Jack Ruetsch against New Zealand

Related Articles

Back to top button