UK & World

Justice of the Peace Breaks Teenager’s £ 10,000 Covid Party Fine

A teenager who was fined £ 10,000 for a party allegedly defeating Covid was abandoned by a justice of the peace.

19-year-old Isaac Parsons was accused of having a rally at his home in Wiltshire last year. According to police, 80 to 100 people attended.

On September 4, police posted on Facebook and issued a £ 10,000 notice to the party after police officers were called to Devizes’s house. This is a criminal record.

At that time, it was a crime to hold a rally of more than 30 people in a private residence, and teenagers Coronavirus Rules.

The fine was initially appealed by the family, and yesterday their lawyer sought dismissal before the trial-because the wrong section of the law was cited in a fixed penalty notice.

The public prosecutor’s office wanted to fix this, but a local judge at the Magistrates’ Court in Swindon refused. He said the proceedings would not have been brought to court if the correct law was used and a £ 100 fine was imposed.

Isaac’s father Martin Parsons, vice president of political affairs of the Devizes Conservation Society, has accused Wiltshire police of “illegal acts in public office and contempt of court.”

Isaac pleaded not guilty to holding a house party in February in violation of coronavirus rules.

District judge Joanna Dickens abandoned it-and accused the CPS and police of how it was treated.

19-year-old Isaac Parsons was accused of having a rally at his home in Wiltshire last year. According to police, 80 to 100 people attended.

Judge Dickens said: ‘The coronavirus is serious. We are all worried about it. I have never dismissed a claim.

“For these £ 10,000 fines, people pay huge amounts of money, and most ordinary people can’t afford to pay £ 10,000.

“Many people will want to appeal it. You don’t want to appeal a £ 100 fine, and most people don’t appeal a parking fine.

“In the end, it was clear to me that people were making mistakes. CPS, the mistakes they are making now are to move on.

“If they told me they would only issue me another £ 100 penalty, that wouldn’t be a problem, I would have said a fine, but that’s not what they’re asking the court to do.

“They want, and I want to be clear about it, they ask the court to proceed with prosecution that would never have happened without the fact that they made a mistake in the first place. ..

“They seem to be trying to get a situation where someone could be guilty. They couldn’t get a criminal record otherwise because it was guided by the crown’s own mistakes. I have. I think it’s a real mistake.

“I would like to observe that if a fine of £ 10,000 is imposed, it must include at least an accurate and relevant section. [of law] To help people understand what their right to appeal is.

“This case worries me and bothers me. There may be situations where another £ 10,000 fine was robbed by the police in a situation where it shouldn’t have been.

“Whether they study those other things is a matter of police, and they may or may not have imposed at this time.

“What I said is not intended to suggest that breaking the rules of the coronavirus is nothing more than a serious problem for all of us.

“That’s my comment. It’s a very rare case that the court doesn’t amend the indictment for the benefit of justice.

“It has many case laws, and major proceedings say you should usually amend, but the courts have broader jurisdiction over the interests of justice, and for those reasons, That’s my reason not to allow [the amendment].. “

Issac’s father said he didn’t want to comment anymore today.

Issac pleaded not guilty to holding a house party in February in violation of coronavirus rules.

A local judge in the Magistrates' Court of Swindon said the proceedings would not have been brought to court if the correct law was used and a fine of £ 100 was imposed.

A local judge in the Magistrates’ Court of Swindon said the proceedings would not have been brought to court if the correct law was used and a fine of £ 100 was imposed.

At the time, he said: ‘I have formally appealed to them (police) for disclosing completely false information on many issues that could jeopardize future proceedings as well.

“What the Wiltshire police put on their Facebook page is the subject of formal complaints and is being investigated by professional standards.”

A Wiltshire police spokesman said he was “surprised” at the dismissal and will seek a review with the CPS.

They said: ‘Yesterday, the Magistrates’ Court in Swindon dismissed a £ 10,000 fine issued by Wiltshire police for possible violations of coronavirus rules.

The fine is related to a police officer being called to an important residential rally in violation of COVID regulations on September 4, during the height of the coronavirus pandemic.

“The fines issued to the event organizers were disputed, leading to yesterday’s court hearing in which the judge dismissed the case.

“While respecting the court’s decision, Wiltshire police were surprised by yesterday’s decision on the circumstances presented by the police in this case.

“In addition to the disputed fines, the CPS reviewed independently available evidence and approved the prosecution as is routine in such cases.

“We are now urgently looking to understand why the case was dismissed by the court and are calling for an urgent meeting with the public prosecutor’s office to consider the case.

“Our police response to an ongoing public health pandemic remains robust, balanced and consistent. Everyone is personally responsible for their actions and is in place. Adhering to the restrictions remains important.

Justice of the Peace Breaks Teenager’s £ 10,000 Covid Party Fine

Source link Justice of the Peace Breaks Teenager’s £ 10,000 Covid Party Fine

Related Articles

Back to top button