Novak Djokovic Q & A: Wild Day, What Happens Next, and Legal Opinions | Novak Djokovic

What’s wrong On Friday??

Another special day Novak Djokovic Saga began at 5:52 pm local time, with Australian immigration minister Alex Hawke using his personal strength to cancel the world’s No. 1 male visa for the second time. Hawk said in a statement that he did so “for health and order, based on the public interest in doing so.”

Hawk’s decision It also reversed Monday’s federal court decision allowing Djokovic to stay in Australia after the visa was first revoked on January 6.

However, three hours later, the parties returned to federal court, where an urgent court hearing was held again in front of Judge Kelly, ending after 11:00 pm.

What came to you from the court hearing?

Three things. First, it was confirmed that Djokovic would meet with Immigration officials at 8 am local time on Saturday. After that, I was able to decide to leave Australia, but such a scenario is unlikely.

If the 34-year-old stays, his legal team and the Australian Government will face each other in court on Sunday morning for a third full inquiry.

Finally, Djokovic’s lawyer also hopes that the Australian government will deport Serbs because they believe that the presence of Serbs can “stimulate emotions against vaccination.” Revealed.

Is it really at the heart of the Australian Government case?

Probably not. Professor Jack Anderson, Dean of the Faculty of Sport Law at the University of Melbourne, explains: There is no doubt that Djokovic’s lawyers are cherry-picking or reinterpreting the minister’s reasoning. Of course it’s their job, but we haven’t seen the minister’s reasoning completely yet. “

What will be Sunday Does your hearing decrease?

“In some respects, it’s very easy,” says Anderson. “The minister has stated that he will cancel Djokovic’s visa for public interest, health and safety reasons, and under the law he has a very wide range of discretion.

“Therefore, Djokovic’s team needs to file a very narrow judicial review application. They try to find a way to claim that the elements of the minister’s decision are not rational-and in fact, it is abandoned and Djokovic’s. It is so irrational that the visa should be revived. “

Is there a risk that the incident will spread next week?

The chances are very low. As Anderson points out, Djokovic’s legal team seeks a trial of the case on Sunday, the government agrees, and both sides present a discussion before the judge decides whether Djokovic can stay. Agreed for a quick one-hour trial. go. And that’s it.

What are the most probable results?

Good question. “Djokovic is likely to have to leave Australia,” Anderson says. “In a sense, the Australian government only has to show that they have acted reasonably and rationally. The case is about whether the court should have done something else. No. It is whether Hawk properly instructed himself about the facts and evidence.

“It will be easier for the government,” Anderson adds. “But Djokovic’s legal team is very sensitive. And when you look back at your first decision, that wasn’t what people imagined. Generally speaking, the judicial review of Australian immigration cases is the government. Is expected to survive this. There has never been an application like this. “

Sign up for The Recap, the editor’s recommended weekly email.

Where are the people standing?

In a recent poll, 83% want to deport Djokovic. “Slow drip drip of information Djokovic’s actions in Serbia After his positive test on 16 December and the breach of federal regulations due to entry into Spain had an impact, “Anderson explains. “It’s balanced by the embarrassment of how the Australian government did this, but certainly public opinion doesn’t support Djokovic.”

Novak Djokovic Q & A: Wild Day, What Happens Next, and Legal Opinions | Novak Djokovic

Source link Novak Djokovic Q & A: Wild Day, What Happens Next, and Legal Opinions | Novak Djokovic

Related Articles

Back to top button