Following the first ever Virtual Labor meeting, Hospital Times editor David Duffy reviews the key health messages of the mentioned and unmentioned messages.
Like most of the year, the party conference season had to change to 2020. The need for virtual formats would have been a major disappointment for anyone looking forward to the familiar sight of complementary drinks at the networking reception. However, given the current level of scrutiny of the government and public disapproval, many of the rival Conservative conventions will be relieved to avoid Owen Jones’ ambush at the conference hall.
Workers faced unique challenges this year, symbolized in many ways by the conference. In the shadow of a humiliating election last December, the party’s new leaders have plagued Labor with anti-Semitism and the worst defeat in nearly 100 years of polls, a tragic legacy of Jeremy Corbyn. Desperately trying to keep a distance from. As a result, the party realized that it needed to present a new case to the British people in the context of a pandemic.
Above all, Covid-19 is a health problem. Historically, if there was one strong lawsuit in the hands of workers, it was trust with the NHS. Perhaps the lack of policy voting at this Labor meeting sets Sir Keir Starmer’s tone of leadership and plans details of his policy agenda (which was relatively lacking in his leadership campaign). It provided a great opportunity.
Well, that’s not what we actually got. But what we got was a loud and clear message of “new leadership” or a translation that meant “I’m neither Jeremy Corbyn nor Boris Johnson.”
Given the magnitude of the defeat in last year’s elections and the ridicule of Vitriol after the Labor Party’s repeated scandals, few blamed him for this tone. The collapse of government decision-making during the pandemic process provided a fertile foundation for this message to attract the frustrated and needy civilians. Many are now looking at imminent unemployment and further financial difficulties.
Listening to the keynote on “Connected,” members were introduced to a carefully edited political promotional video, portrayed Labor leaders with key workers, and had a serious-looking conversation. Often framed. Aside from the content, the tone was clear – one of the politicians, not the grassroots activist.
There’s little to get in the way of the manifesto, but it’s clear that Sir Kear won’t be a dressed-up version of Jeremy Corbyn. Instead, significant similarities to the way Tony Blair seized the party in 1994 have already emerged. “New Labor” has already been created, but the phrase “new leadership” conveys a similar message.
The new leader has already proved ruthless in claiming his control over the party, but it remains to be seen how the party’s left and factions of momentum will hinder his success. If anything, the ardent opposition from the party’s left sends a clear message to more people that the Labor Party is changing.
Covid-19 dominates health policy
So what does this all mean for workers’ health policies? Not surprisingly, Covid-19 was the only area of policy that Lord Kear spent a great deal of time on. His focus here was primarily constructed as an attack on the Tories’ incompetence in dealing with pandemics. That said, the new leaders were looking at austerity policies and their impact on the preparation of Covid-19 in the UK. “If you neglect public services, you can’t prepare for a crisis,” he said. “No one blames the government for the presence of the virus, but they are under the watchful eye of a lack of funding for the NHS and public health services, and a lack of investment in social care and infection prevention.”
After that, Starmer focused directly on the character of the prime minister. Starmer accused Johnson of “wanting to solve the problem” and simply “not having a job.” The tact is clear, and Starmer may have said, “This is a job for adults.”
Starmer’s speech is now on a poll that the Labor Party will overtake the Tories, which seems to be a once-in-a-lifetime high for most Labor members, but the government pandemic is disturbing during the national crisis. It did not appear as the opposite. “We support the rational steps needed to save lives and protect the NHS,” he stated.
Citing the apparent collapse of NHS’s testing and tracking programs, Starmer said, “We all want government success,” but with a remedy that loses control of the situation and requires “new leadership.” I emphasized that there is.
In fact, this was as far as the new Labor leaders did with respect to actual health policy, if you could call it it. Soon after, Starmer outlined how his own “instinct” encouraged him to become a lawyer, and the same instinct continued to drive his leadership.
Ashworth lies in the government for more details
Labor leaders’ speeches were dominated by personality wills and the usual “big picture” mindset, but Labor Shadow Health Secretary Jonathan Ashworth had the bone to choose with the government about medical failures. .. Ashworth’s speech was part of a policy proposal outlining the abominable prosecution of coronavirus treatment and how labor differs.
“Our NHS and staff are worth more than a rainbow or applause. They are worth paying the right wages, equipment and attention to get the job done,” Ashworth said. Leicester South MP has blamed the government for contributing to “the scale of the tragedy of humans arrested earlier this year.”
Minister Shadowhealth further thanked the public for their joint efforts to address Covid-19, adding that “the minister could not support the end of the negotiations.” The Shadow Health Secretary quoted the “dangerous moments” that the country is currently facing, emphasizing that the last thing we need is a “second wave of ministerial mistakes.”
Not surprisingly, Ashworth turned much of his purpose into a test and trace system that appeared to be on the verge of collapse day by day. Here he repeated many of the emotions that emerged from the recent “indie sage” conference. This is a publicly faced and independent alternative to the government’s own experts in assessing the government’s performance in dealing with pandemics. Members of this group inform me that Mr. Ashworth has already met them separately. These conferences seem to be scraping him off to reflect Indie Sage’s desire to increase investment in NHS test infrastructure and increase lab capacity across UK universities. Going further, he dismissed the government’s recently revealed lunar shooting program and lamented the fact that “the minister gave a failed outsourced company like Serco this valuable and life-saving role.”
According to him, the priority is to protect people “through locally funded public health, not privatization or profit,” and to leave contact tracing to the local health team. In the absence of proven performance for Serco and other private companies to provide functional testing and tracing systems, they somehow landed with the prospect of a £ 100bn government contract.
The Shadow Health Secretary also had some important messages about health inequality. A Marmot review found that life expectancy has declined over the last decade, and that life expectancy has declined and poverty levels have risen in some parts of the UK. Ashworth has been armed with harsh criticism of one of the biggest areas of Tory failure for the past decade. “Health inequality is the worst of all,” he said, calling for an “attack on poverty” to put health and welfare equity at the center of society.
The extent of the Labor Party’s policy shift is still unknown
Starmer’s vague policy platform based on his leadership campaign was clearly an attempt to soothe every corner of the party – it worked for the most part. Ultimately, the new leader presents a manifesto that can disappoint one of the two wings, but the midst of a pandemic and economic crisis is certainly not the time to do it.
More interesting turmoil about health policy came from the Shadow Health Secretary, but even with Ashworth’s sharp criticism, there is still little overall to take from these speeches that lay the true foundation of the labor manifesto. This is more than we can understand in five years until the next general election. For now, Labor is careful not to expose a policy platform that allows conservatives to talk about anything other than their failure at Covid-19. Ultimately, Starmer needs to show his hand. Whether Boris Johnson or not, Labor will need to do more than just stay away from corbinism in order to win the next general election.
The workforce is changing. How Unknown – Hospital Times
Source link The workforce is changing. How Unknown – Hospital Times