UK & World

Why “elite” football club own goals bring Boris Johnson’s political challenges

You are reading Our Daily Political Briefing, The Waugh Zone. Sign up now Get it by email in the evening.

For obvious reasons, football and politics rarely mix. Even more football fans than the average voter are walking lie detectors and are inherently distrustful of attempts to adopt their beloved game for party purposes.

Its ability to sniff fake at 50 yards is why MPs often get stuck when they start chatting about our national sport.David Cameron’s Astonham’s mistake It was unbearable, but Ed Milband was never as scary as when a real Leeds fan asked a detailed question about a club he claimed to support (he was Boston Red). It was much more comfortable to talk about the Sox).

Even real fans have no immunity. One of the decisive moments of Andy Burnham’s political career was when he was a cultural secretary in 2009, when the Hillsboro Anniversary speech at Anfield Ground in Liverpool was interrupted by a wave of anger. I did. He was the face of the government, the face of the founding, and the chanting of “96 Justice” stopped him and admitted that he needed more action than words.

Boris Johnson’s own affinity for football is undeniably quite weak. Unlike being said to like pints of beer (why he likes wine and still prefers expensive wine?), At least he doesn’t pretend to support the club. Understand the basic rules of the game regarding tackles.. However, the Prime Minister quickly found that he needed to work on the proposed European Super League.

Understanding that in the 2019 elections the Tories’ interests happened to be in a town that had both a strong vacation vote record and a lower league football club, the political demands for this became clearer. I will. The Conservatives were home to Accrington, Berry, Blackpool, Burnley, Lincoln, Ipswich, Crew and Port Vale, while the Labor Party was collecting votes in big cities such as London, Manchester and Newcastle.

The anger that has spread among fans with the idea of ​​the Super League is focused on the fear that it is too far a step in the commercialization of sports. The very idea of ​​creating a league for the wealthiest clubs that are unlikely to be demoted removes the sense of danger that gives the sport its meaning.

Since football is an “elite sport”, the government has given special and rare privileges to the exemption from the Covid rules in this pandemic. Still, big six clubs wanting to leave now look more like a financial elite than a sports elite. And after more than a year of fans being locked out of the match, they are locked out of the club’s future.

At this point, it is worth saying that the rich football club owners do not monopolize the hambags and hypocrisy of this current column. UEFA and FIFA have overseen the commercialization of football money-making for years. The record of their corruption makes the International Olympic Committee look like a paragon of virtue. With huge amounts of money and debt, fans are also in the vehicle.

Even supporters of lower league clubs can recall the days when the Football League itself was truly closed until 1986. For decades, he used the “re-election” Byzantine system to keep out non-league clubs. My own club, Rochdale, has benefited from the wise president’s ability to smooth the bosses of other leagues to avoid oblivion. Hartlepool United had to apply for 11 reelections in 28 seasons after finishing in the bottom four of Part 4, but each time it was successful.

This Super League idea could be just a tactic to get a better deal from the Champions League. However, the backlash is so strong that it feels like a turning point not only in the reputation of these clubs, but also in the role that politicians and governments are ready to intervene.

At Commons, cultural secretary Oliver Dowden said he felt that his role “as a conservative” was to protect “threatening” institutions. The government will support strict sanctions by football authorities, but he also “puts everything on the table,” from stricter competition laws to regaining Covid’s funding.

The appointment of former Sports Minister Tracey Crouch (a real fan) will consider financing, governance, and the creation of an independent regulator. Dauden even insisted that the government “do whatever it takes” to protect the interests of football fans. This can lead to skepticism from self-employed people and others who feel disappointed with similar promises to Covid.

Labor Joe Stevens (another suitable sports fan) said it took the Tories 11 years to act, and that Dauden triggered a pledge to review the Tories 2019 Manifest in the Super League. Withered about the threat. Again, the accusations against Johnson are dithering and delaying, or, as Stevens said, “all experts, no progress on the pitch.” She may have added that “greed” is so respected by the Prime Minister that she cited it as the reason for the advancement of the Big Pharma vaccine.

Perhaps Stevens’ strongest claim was that football proved that “Tory’s trickle-down economics didn’t work.” The big picture is also how prepared the Johnson government is to use the state to intervene in the broken market. Clubs are “too big to fail” (or demoted) businesses, and the idea of ​​being able to create new (literally) anti-competitive cartels surprises many of the different political parties.

Most interesting is whether this entire column encourages the Johnson government to rethink the broader reconsideration of traditional economics. There, happiness and environmental degradation are imprinted on new indicators of GDP, and “stakeholders” are just as important as shareholders.

That may not be straightforward for many Tories, but probably not in the Redwall seats where many of our lower league teams live. The point of Brexit’s vote was that some things (such as national sovereignty) were more valuable than money. “Regaining control” can mean giving football fans the opportunity to do just that through new fan-led football ownership rules.

In fact, Dauden clearly recalled the memories of the 2019 election, saying, “We are the people’s government and it is clear that we are on the side of our fans.” They are pretty bold words and carry political risks. Raised expectations for radical behavior, Johnson can feel as much repulsion as the leaving club itself if he fails to follow through or doesn’t fully approve the Crouch review.

Why “elite” football club own goals bring Boris Johnson’s political challenges

Source link Why “elite” football club own goals bring Boris Johnson’s political challenges

Related Articles

Back to top button