Released as a single in 1967 by the late Queen of Soul, the poignant love ballad now faces scrutiny. woman and femininity In general.
The move to remove the song is led by the Norway-based Transcultural Mindfulness Alliance (TCMA). TCMA formed earlier this year and has since made its presence known in a series of polarizing posts on social media.
Since then, the organization’s statement, which aims to open chapters “in every country in Europe and in North America,” has sparked outrage, including demanding that Franklin’s song be removed from streaming platforms on Jan. 20. Spotify and apple music.
Aretha Franklin’s song “Natural Woman” has been slammed as “offensive” by LGBTQ critics, with one organization saying the song helps perpetuate harmful anti-trans stereotypes
The move to remove the song is led by the Norway-based Transcultural Mindfulness Alliance (TCMA). The group formed earlier this year and has since made its presence known in a series of polarizing posts on social media.
Perceived by many as a parody, the post began by claiming that the song was offensive to transgender people and that “there is no such thing as a ‘natural’ woman.”
“Aretha Franklin’s 1968 song ‘Natural Woman’ perpetuates multiple pernicious anti-trance stereotypes,” the post read, erroneously listing the song’s September 1967 release as 1968. bottom.
“There is no such thing as a ‘natural’ woman,” the organization continued to declare, claiming that the song had already “helped to incite acts of harm against transgender women.”
TCMA said it wanted the song “removed from Spotify and Apple Music.”
The group’s first social media post, the post garnered national attention, garnering more than 300,000 views in just a few days.
But in terms of likes, the response was more lukewarm, with the post just over 100 as of Monday.
Since then, statements from the organization, which aims to open chapters “in every country in Europe and in North America,” have drawn outrage, including demanding on Jan. 20 that Franklin’s songs be removed from streaming platforms such as Spotify and Apple Music. caused
Social media users were quick to question whether the account, which was launched days ago, was satirical and designed to ignite the ongoing war between progressives and the political right. questioned.
Other posts that followed included statements many deemed similarly controversial.
“There was absolutely no meaningful research on gender identity in pets,” one post published later in the day said the organizers should allow children to determine the gender of their pets. said.
“It seems pointless, but many children learn their gender from their pets,” the organizers wrote. “Let your child choose the gender of their pet just because they brought home a pet that has a ‘gender’. Do not assign “freely”. “
Other Posts Following Statements Many Deemed Equally Controversial
In another article on feminine hygiene, the organizers wrote: You don’t have to ovulate to get your period.
“Periods are more states of mind than actual states,” the post continued, after which the transitioned biological male “You could definitely be menstruating and need free hygiene products.”
Other demands televised by the organization included a ban on listing gender on birth certificates in their native Norway and an “international police force to prosecute prejudice.”
Following its initial post about Franklin’s classic melody, TCMA was quickly criticized by multiple Twitter users for its brazen request.
Despite many claims that the group is legitimate, including TCMA itself, many users remain skeptical and believe the impudent demands are a gag.
But the group proved its legitimacy in a post published Monday morning.
“To be clear, TCMA is not a parody organization,” read the organizers, “a group of trans individuals trying to create a more just culture for transgender people.
“We are based in Norway, but we are also aiming to open branches in other European countries and North America,” the group revealed.
However, after the initial post about Franklin’s classic melody, TCMA was quickly criticized by multiple Twitter users.
Others, including Standing for Women founder Kellie-Jay Keen, called the request to remove the song misogynistic and an insult to women owning their femininity. accused of being.
“You must be kidding me,” he wrote. “No one cancels Aretha Franklin.”
Others, including Standing for Women founder Kellie-Jay Keen, denounced the song as misogynistic and the request to pull the song as an insult to women owning their own femininity. .
Appearing in an interview with Sky News Australia on Sunday, Keane argued that “being a woman is not a crime” as backlash against the organization continues to soar.
“Being an attacked mother is now called a birth mother or a pregnant mother,” Keane said, appearing in an interview in front of a billboard featuring an inscription of the aforementioned phrase.
“I don’t think many women really know how much we hate them. I hate to say it…I don’t have a victim mentality, but I ignore the misogyny of this particular movement.” is really difficult.
“It means a man who says he’s scared to go to the men’s restroom. His words are more trustworthy than a woman who says she doesn’t want that man in her space.”
According to social media profiles, the group was founded in January 2023 “exclusively by transgender individuals” and aims to instill “cultural change to ensure the inclusion of trans individuals.” increase.
The group’s request to remove Franklin’s song has failed to attract the attention of more prominent activist groups, but it has garnered support from some bystanders on social media. The identity of the group’s founder is not yet known.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11666981/Now-Aretha-Franklins-song-Natural-Woman-deemed-OFFENSIVE-trans-women.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490 Aretha Franklin’s song ‘Natural Woman’ is now considered offensive to transgender women